Washington, D.C. – July 23, 2025 – Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has unveiled declassified documents that claim the Obama administration misrepresented Russia’s intentions in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The documents allege that former President Barack Obama directed intelligence officials to push a narrative that Russian President Vladimir Putin favored Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, despite lacking evidence. This explosive revelation has sparked heated political debate, raising questions about intelligence politicization while not refuting Russia’s documented interference in the election.

Explosive Claims in Declassified Documents

The documents, released by Gabbard’s office on July 18, 2025, allege that Obama’s national security team—including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, and former FBI Director James Comey—fabricated a narrative post-election to suggest Putin actively supported Trump. According to the files, pre-election intelligence assessments concluded that Russia was “probably not trying” to influence the election via cyberattacks. However, after Trump’s 2016 victory, a December 9, 2016, meeting allegedly led to the use of the controversial Steele dossier to shape the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which claimed Russia aimed to boost Trump’s campaign.

The Steele dossier, funded by the Clinton campaign and compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele, has been widely criticized for containing unverified information. Gabbard’s report suggests it was improperly used to support claims of Russian favoritism toward Trump, contradicting earlier intelligence findings. Gabbard has called this a “treasonous conspiracy” to undermine Trump’s presidency, announcing that her office has referred the matter to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for potential criminal investigations.

Political Firestorm and Conflicting Reports

The declassification has ignited a fierce partisan divide. Republicans, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, have hailed Gabbard’s actions as a step toward exposing a “deep state” plot. Johnson posted on X, “The Russia hoax was a lie crafted by Obama’s team to sabotage Trump. Justice is coming!” President Trump echoed this sentiment, sharing a satirical video on Truth Social depicting Obama’s arrest.

Democrats, however, have slammed the release as a politically motivated distortion. Representative Jim Himes (D-Conn.) labeled the allegations “baseless,” accusing Gabbard of recycling discredited claims to deflect from other controversies, including Trump’s Epstein connections. Senator Mark Warner (D-Va.) defended the 2017 ICA, citing the Senate Intelligence Committee’s 2020 bipartisan report, which confirmed Russia’s efforts to harm Clinton’s campaign through DNC email hacks and disinformation.

Multiple investigations, including the 2019 Mueller report and the 2023 Durham report, have corroborated Russia’s interference, though they found no evidence of vote tampering. Critics argue that Gabbard’s documents misrepresent the absence of vote manipulation as evidence against broader Russian interference, creating confusion about the 2017 ICA’s conclusions.

Steele Dossier Controversy and Intelligence Integrity

The Steele dossier remains central to the debate. Gabbard’s report references emails from an “ODNI whistleblower” shocked by the dossier’s influence on the 2017 ICA. However, sources familiar with the Senate’s 2020 probe note that the CIA excluded the dossier from the ICA due to its unverified nature. This discrepancy fuels ongoing concerns about intelligence politicization, with Gabbard framing her actions as a push to restore trust in U.S. intelligence agencies.

Former intelligence officials, like Larry Pfeiffer, warn that Gabbard’s selective declassification could further erode public confidence in the intelligence community. Meanwhile, the DOJ has confirmed receipt of Gabbard’s criminal referral, with reports indicating potential investigations into Brennan and Comey for false statements to Congress.

Broader Implications

Gabbard’s move aligns with President Trump’s March 2025 directive to declassify all documents related to the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane probe into Russian interference. The timing has drawn scrutiny, with critics like Obama’s spokesperson, Patrick Rodenbush, calling the allegations a “desperate distraction” from Trump’s controversies. Rodenbush emphasized that no evidence suggests vote manipulation, aligning with intelligence findings.

As the DOJ reviews Gabbard’s referral, the declassification underscores deep divisions over the 2016 election’s legacy. While raising valid concerns about intelligence handling, the documents do not negate Russia’s confirmed interference, leaving the public grappling with questions of truth and accountability.

Stay Informed with Click USA News

For the latest updates on this unfolding story, visit Click USA News. We’ll keep you informed on the investigations, political reactions, and what this means for America’s democratic institutions.